Having released in due time 64-digit processors, AMD were won by a huge number of admirers. Thanks to excellent multitasking and good graphic opportunities, AMD processors won glory cheap, but enough productive processors.
Intel older player in the field of production of the processors, the largest producer of semiconductors, is the recognized leader in development of computer chips.
In the article we will make small comparison between production of these companies.
Fight between these companies, probably, the most long of all what ever happened in the computer world. Corporate rivalry ascends by 1969, from Advanced Micro Devices corporation creation, all in a year after Intel corporation creation. In January, 1995 both corporations settled all lawsuits in which they were involved, but competitive war and fight for a rank of the best producer of processors still proceeds.
Getting the computer or the processor, the majority of people looks first of all at the price and values of clock frequency of the processor. Some more advanced users pay attention to such characteristics, as graphics productivity, game opportunities, power consumption and other similar features. Further we provide the small generalized comparison of production of Intel and AMD in article.
We will compare and oppose both brands on significant for the majority of users to criteria.
1 . Price.
When we speak about the prices, certainly, AMD has advantage. Its processors were always cheaper than processors from Intel.
2 . Power consumption.
Comparing the general power consumption, we find out that Intel processors consume less electric power, than AMD processors.
3 . 3D games.
Exactly thanks to the integrated graphic processor, models of processors from AMD, it was succeeded to win glory of processors optimum suitable for the game computer. Now any more everything is so unambiguous. Though considering the low prices and excellent graphic productivity, AMD processors perfectly are suitable for the budgetary game computer.
4 . Graphics.Actually, results of comparison will be approximately the same, as well as in a case with 3D – games. If you are limited in the budget, buy AMD. If money for you not a problem, the representative of the highest line of processors from any brand.
5 . MP3 and video coding.
Coding of video and audio of files means high computing power of the processor. Coding speed will depend on it. Intel processors considerably surpass the colleagues from AMD in respect of computing productivity. Therefore if you have to face often similar tasks, it is better to stop the choice on Intel processors.
6 . Processor heating.
Modern Intel processors consume smaller quantity of the electric power and as a result are less heated.
7 . Work with the main appendices.
Well and the last that we will consider in comparison, these are functions which are important practically for any PC user. Work with office applications, the Internet – browsers, etc., and also multitasking.
All models of processors perfectly cope with the main appendices now, including models of the budgetary lines of Intel and AMD. Therefore at a computer choice for office, the cost of this or that processor has to be the main criterion for you.
To sum up the result and to make our small review fuller, we will note that if you want to buy the super productive and fast processor, choose between lines of Intel Core i7 and AMD Phenom II. If you want to buy something more available, but thus rather well working with video games and graphics, look narrowly at the Intel Core i3 or AMD Phenom series. And if the price is for you the main defining criterion, choose or Intel Celeron, Centrino, Atom, or AMD Sempron or Athlon Neo.
No comments:
Post a Comment